Election officials are gearing up to remove tens of thousands of Oklahomans from the state’s voter rolls — a controversial practice voting-rights advocates say can lead to disenfranchised voters.
Oklahoma is one of seven states that allow election officials to remove names from the state’s voter registration list if they haven’t voted in several election cycles and don’t respond to address confirmation mailings.
That process, which is done every two years in Oklahoma, will begin this April.
If it’s like the last voter purge in 2017, a sizable portion of the state’s nearly 2.2 million registered voters will come off the rolls.
A list obtained by Oklahoma Watch from the state Election Board shows that 291,233 names have been deleted since 2017. Of that amount, more than half were deleted due to inactivity. The purge of inactive voters occurs in April in every odd year.
State Election Secretary Paul Ziriax said deleting the names of inactive voters helps maintain the integrity of elections by ensuring that registration lists are accurate and up to date.
He added that voters are only removed due to inactivity after a multistep process in which someone hasn’t voted for four general-election cycles, covering an eight-year period, and doesn’t respond to the address confirmation notice the state sends out when someone has been inactive for four years.
But legal challenges, controversies in other states and a new push by congressional Democrats to ban so-called “use-it-or-lose-it” voting laws has put the issue under renewed scrutiny.
“Voting should never be a use it or lose it,” said Leigh Chapman, voting rights program director for the Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit that lobbies for civil rights laws. “It’s a right, and we should be making it easier to vote, not harder.”
How voters are removed
Through a largely automated process, the state Election Board is constantly updating voter rolls when someone has moved, died, been convicted of a felony or has been certified as mentally incapacitated.
The process for removing inactive voters begins in the spring following a general election.
Before June 1, the state will send the address confirmation to voters who haven’t cast a ballot in either of the last two general elections or any state or local elections in that time period.
If the voter doesn’t respond within 60 days of receiving the letter, they are put on “inactive status” but are still cleared to vote. The voter can regain their active status at any time by voting in any election or updating their voter registration information.
But if the voter, while on inactive status, doesn’t participate in an election for two more general election cycles, their voter registration will be purged and they will need to re-register if they want to vote again.
That means the voters will be purged this year didn’t vote in 2012 or 2014 elections, didn’t respond to the address confirmation letter and haven’t voted since.
The essentially eight-year period is longer than many of the six other states that have similar laws. Ohio and Georgia, for example, allow election officials to purge voters after a six-year period of inactivity.
But without fail, there will be some voters who had been purged who will go to vote with the assumption they are still eligible and will be turned away.
“There will be someone who says they last voted for Bill Clinton or George H.W. Bush in 1992 and they’re not registered any more and they want to know why,” Ziriax said. “But I can’t control that and I can’t control what the law says.”
Oklahoma and the other states with use-it-or-lose-it voting laws faced a threat last year when the U.S. Supreme Court took up a case seeking to overturn Ohio’s law.
The court, in a 5-4 decision, ruled that Ohio’s law did not violate the National Voting Right Act, clearing the way for states to continue removing voters.
The issue was further pushed into the spotlight last year when Georgia purged hundreds of thousands of voters ahead of its contentious gubernatorial election, which Republican Brian Kemp ended up winning by a slim margin over Democrat Stacey Abrams.
In that case, as well as with other voting purges, critics argued the policy disproportionately hurts minority and Democratic voters.
Chapman said this is likely because minority groups tend to move more — raising the chance that they never received the address confirmation notice — and have faced voter suppression issues in the past.
Democrats most affected
A review of Oklahoma’s purge of inactive voters in 2017 shows that Democrats were disproportionately affected.
Of the 167,011 who were deleted due to inactivity, about 46% were Democrats. Voter registration statistics before the purge, on Jan. 1, 2017, show that Democrats made up about 39% of all registered voters.
Republicans, meanwhile, made up about 33% of the purged inactive voters while making up nearly 46% of the pre-purge voter registration totals.
University of Oklahoma political science professor Keith Gaddie suggested one of the reasons Democrats are more likely to be purged due to inactivity is because “many elderly voters who start to become less prone to vote are more likely to be Democrats.”
Also, he added, “Low-propensity voters are more likely to end up purged, and they also tend to more often be independents and Democrats.”
With the regular purging, the total number of registered voters tends to increase in even years, when state elections occur, and fall in odd years. In January 2008, there were 2,022,537 registered voters, slightly more than the 2,016,157 in January 2018, state Election Board data shows. Various factors can affect overall and party totals in voter registration. Registered Democrats have dropped by 24% while Republicans have gained by 19% over the period.