Tulsa city councilors passed additional COVID-19-related measures at a special meeting Tuesday night, expanding the Tulsa Health Department’s oversight of public events and adding means to punish businesses that are not complying with city mandates.
The eight councilors present Tuesday night — with District 5 Councilor Cass Fahler absent — passed two ordinances covering those requirements as well as new guidelines for social distancing at bars and restaurants.
Councilors spent much of Tuesday night’s meeting discussing how to best enforce city COVID-19 mandates on businesses without putting those at the point of sale in a vulnerable position.
Councilor Lori Decter-Wright said she and others wanted to give businesses the backing to stand their ground on requiring customers to mask up and social distance.
The ordinance approved Tuesday night requires businesses to request that customers comply with masking and social distancing rules. Those not doing so, either actively or passively, may be found public nuisances by the Tulsa Health Department and subject to Tulsa Police Department enforcement.
Decter-Wright said while she is concerned about those who may become belligerent toward employees over a mask requirement, she said she doesn’t want the city to “what if” itself out of enforcing the mandate.
“I think it will empower our businesses to say, ‘I have to do this because I want to stay open,’” Decter-Wright said. “It’s going to have to come from the top, from the company CEO down to the management and training the clerks to de-escalate.
“I can really appreciate, and I know people feel like it’s unsafe. But I hope that we’re not going to go down the what-if worm hole for the 1 or 2 percent of the population that literally is just not going to cooperate.”
Those penalties against businesses, up to a $1,200 fine or 6 months in the city jail, also apply to public events and gatherings operating without or out of compliance with COVID-19 safety plans through the Health Department.
Previously, the Tulsa Health Department required a COVID-19 safety plan for a public gathering of more than 500 people at least 14 days ahead of the event. Tuesday night’s ordinance lowers that limit to 150 people, with Councilor Kara Joy McKee suggesting that the number drop further to 25 if the Health Department can keep up with event requests.
“I realize this is not a popular opinion, but I felt the need to state it that 150 is still a bit high,” McKee said. “Given the emergency situation we are in, I wish that we had a solution here with a lower number for recommendation of safety plans and enforcement.
“But this is what we have, and I hope my colleagues, if our numbers continue to climb, we come back from the holiday break to consider lowering that number a bit.”
Tulsa Health Department Director Bruce Dart said the department is limited by how many safety plans it can review. Data show good outcomes when events follow approved safety plans, and Dart said requiring safety plans for events smaller than 150 would have “even greater success” in slowing the virus’ transmission.
But lowering that number pushes the limits of what existing Health Department resources can accomplish, Dart said.
“It’s a good point, but our ability to manage all of those plans on top of everything we’re doing now, it’s going to be a real difficulty,” Dart said. “It’ll be hard for us to manage. … We’re really engaged with our current number of 500, and I’m going to have to add staff when we lower it to 150.
“We only have a certain amount of bandwidth. Everyone here’s already doing more than one job as it is.”
Councilors did approve a grandfather clause for events in the next few days that didn’t require a safety plan before Tuesday night’s vote, though Dart said the department would do “whatever it takes” to evaluate plans submitted for those events.
Councilors also passed a local ordinance with language mirroring Gov. Kevin Stitt's recent executive order on restaurant and bar social distancing requirements.
However, the statewide order requires those businesses to close by 11 p.m., with the exception of delivery and drive-through windows. City Council Chairman Ben Kimbro said he believed the 11 p.m. rule singled out bars and restaurants, a sentiment echoed by other councilors. The state order will still be enforced in Tulsa, but the city's ordinance does not include that 11 p.m. closure requirement, so if the state order expires before the city's ordinance, the city will not impose such a restriction.
The ordinance was also further expanded to cover all "places of public accommodation," which includes many businesses now ordered to maintain at least 6 feet of separation between customers, clients or parties. Child care centers were the lone exception to that requirement.
Report non-compliance with existing city ordinances regarding COVID-19 at www.tulsa-health.org/COVIDcomplaint.
Featured video: Tulsa Health Department director says COVID-19 fight goes beyond masks
Gallery: In lieu of statewide mask mandate, what are area cities doing for COVID-19 safety?
City of Tulsa

Tulsa Mayor G.T. Bynum speaks Nov. 10.
Tulsa was the first city in Tulsa County to approve a mask mandate.
"In July, we passed a mask ordinance in Tulsa because our local hospitals warned we were on an unsustainable trajectory for increased COVID hospitalizations. We set our record for hospitalizations to that point, before our mask ordinance and collective action by Tulsans started to bring our hospitalizations down.
"Today, our COVID hospitalizations in Tulsa are 93% higher than that July record," Bynum said Nov. 25. "It is important to note that 68% of the hospitalizations in Tulsa since September are not Tulsa residents. They are people who live outside our city, but are being treated in the flagship facilities for a regional health care system that serves this whole part of the state.
"This is why we’ve been pressing for help from either the state or our neighboring communities."
Check out the most recent story: Tulsa City Council adds teeth to mask, distancing requirements
Sand Springs

Sand Springs City Council on Nov. 23 unanimously passed a citywide ordinance requiring face coverings in public places effective Nov. 27. Councilors stated they will continue to review the ordinance on a monthly basis, as has been the case since the early stages of the pandemic. Click here to read more from the Sand Springs Leader.
Related gallery: Sand Springs City Council approves mask ordinance
Muskogee

Muskogee city councilors had rejected five previous attempts at passing a mask mandate but on Nov. 23 voted 5-3 in favor. It requires the use of masks in public by anyone age 10 or older for at least the next 60 days.
There is no criminal penalty for noncompliance, but refusal could lead to a trespassing complaint upon refusal of orders to leave a business.
Muskogee County Commissioners declared a state of emergency before the council meeting on Monday citing “significant and consistent” increases in cases of COVID-19, as well as staffing problems at a local hospital.
Jenks

The mask ordinance in Jenks, approved Nov. 10, expires Jan. 31 and would apply to residents age 10 and older. Violations could lead to a municipal financial penalty of up to $200, though councilors noted that convictions — misdemeanors — would not come from a court of record.
Glenpool

Glenpool city councilors passed a mask mandate with a 3-2 vote Nov. 18.
Mayor Tim Fox, Vice Mayor Momodou Ceesay and Ward 3 Councilor Joyce Calvert voted for the mandate, which Fox said is modeled after the city of Tulsa’s.
Glenpool’s mandate requires everyone age 10 or older without a valid medical exemption to wear a mask in public. It does not affect Glenpool Public Schools’ mask policy.
Sapulpa

The Sapulpa City Council approved a mask mandate by a 6-4 vote Nov. 16.
The ordinance applies to anyone 10 years of age or older.
The vote came nearly four months after Sapulpa city councilors voted 7-3 to reject a mask mandate.
Claremore

Claremore City Council on Nov. 20 voted to require those 10 years and older to wear a mask in public. The ordinance, effective Dec. 20, also requires people to maintain six feet of distance between persons who are not part of the same household while in public places.
Councilors were unable to implement an emergency immediate effective date due to lack of quorum but will bring the issue back up at the Dec. 7 meeting, according to city officials.
Owasso

Owasso city leaders decided in mid-November they would not issue a citywide mask mandate. Councilors instead approved a resolution Nov. 17 encouraging all residents to wear masks or face coverings in public, and practice social distancing and other preventive steps to slow the spread of the coronavirus.
Owasso Mayor Bill Bush said he feels the decision should rest in the hands of Owasso citizens and individual businesses.
Bush (left), Owasso City Manager Warren Lehr (front right) and Councilman Chris Kelly (back right) are pictured Aug. 4.
Broken Arrow

Broken Arrow Mayor Craig Thurmond and several city councilors at a meeting Nov. 24 reminded their audience at least half a dozen times that city leaders there would not support a legally enforceable mask ordinance, and they voted 4-1 against a nonbinding resolution that would have “strongly recommended” masks in public.
Other cities without mandates

"Bixby City Council has consistently emphasized the primacy of personal action in any community response plan. At each step of the process – from sheltering in-place in the spring to re-opening in the summer to the return in-person instruction at school – we, as a Council, have reiterated the need for individual vigilance and responsibility," Mayor Brian Guthrie said Nov. 12. "We have supported the efforts of businesses and other public gathering spaces to adopt those sanitizing, distancing, and masking policies that best protect their patrons and guests. Our experience has been that voluntary community actions are just as effective as any mandates without enforcement."
“The mask mandate is always in consideration but we are still continuing to follow the CDC guidelines,” Catoosa City Manager John Blish said. “And with the new mandates coming out or the new recommendations coming out from the Governor’s Office, then we are going to continue following those.”
Coweta City Council will continue to monitor data and consider actions at a Dec. 7 meeting, city officials have said.
Skiatook City Councilors rejected a proposed mask mandate Nov. 16. Skiatook Journal reported on the meeting.
Join a growing group of Oklahomans who believe in supporting local journalism

Start a Tulsa World digital subscription for just $1 a month for 3 months for a limited time.